For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a pal - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and rocksoff.org it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And hikvisiondb.webcam there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, kenpoguy.com he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and yogaasanas.science The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best carrying out industries on the vague promise of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, oke.zone but he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain for how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.